AdvertCN - 广告中国

 找回密码
 立即注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

Binom
 谷歌+Bing+TT+MSN官方代理 
⚡️按条S5代理⚡️静态⚡️独享⚡️5G⚡️最干净<Wifi住宅+5G移动>IP代理指纹浏览器,就用AdsPower
Mediabuy⚡️玩家开户首选【鲁班跨境通-自助充值转账】FB/GG/TT❤️官方免费开户Affiliate 全媒体流量资源⚡️
Taboola/Outbrain /Bing⚡️一级代理开户投流-7*24h❤️人工在线【官方】❤️搜索套利广告开户独立站⚡️开户投放
DuoPlus专注打造跨境电商云手机E.PN 虚拟卡BINOM TRACKER 60% OFF!比Adplexity还好用的Spy工具
MediaGo+Taboola+Ob开户百度国际MediaGo⚡️让产品狂奔全球百度国际,高点击转化,快速放量百度国际MediaGo,独家原生流量
ADPLEXITY + ADVERTCN7200W全球动态不重复住宅IP代理虚拟信用卡+独立站收款全球虚拟卡, 支持U充值
Facebook 批量上广告尤里改 - FB 稳定投放免费黑五教程(持续更新、欢迎交流)FB 三不限源头 - 自助下户充值转款
各种主页、账单户、BM户(优势)⚡️个人户,bm户不限额,账单户一手BM分享户不限额9Proxy ⚡️ $0.04/IP, 无限带宽
FB二三解0.1元一个虚拟卡|PTM星际卡FB专用虚拟卡Google、Bing官方总代  联盟流量开户
FB账号资源/稳定靠谱/运行5年啦FB开户代投/三不限/白名单fb耐用号0.01一个fb账号官方合作商
广告位出租   
查看: 3473|回复: 6

下午无聊, benchmark 一下手头上几个cloud, vps, dedicated server

[复制链接]

1618

主题

2万

广告币

2万

积分

管理员

宇宙无敌河马天神

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

积分
29625

社区QQ达人

发表于 2014-5-26 10:03:51 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
下午机器在安装cpanel,需要一段时间,闲的无聊,就测试了手头上几个 cloud, vps 和 dedicated 的性能

全部使用的是Unixbench 5.1.13

还有一台德国的server  和 加拿大的备份服务器,明天再来测试一下

第一个, liquidweb 的 storm ssd. 这个用了几年了,uptime 100%,确实不错。可惜我确实用不到他们的 managed 的功能,每个月要120 刀,确实很贵。

配置: 2.7 GB Ram, 1 core,  35G SSD, 要120 刀 (需要managed 的可以看下wiredtree,liquidweb 感觉全给他们交广告费了,遍地都是liquidweb 的广告)

他们也真敢卖,拿 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31220 的 U 来做cloud

benchmark 的得分确实是最低的。
# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
# # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #
# # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ######
# # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # #
# # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # #
#### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #


Version 5.1.3 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark


Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
January 13, 2011 johantheghost at yahoo period com
x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10


x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10


x Execl Throughput 1 2 3


x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3


x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3


x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3


x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10


x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10


x Process Creation 1 2 3


x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10


x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3


x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3


=======================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)


System: v.XXX.com: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.32-431.11.2.el6.x86_64 — #1 SMP Tue Mar 25 19:59:55 UTC 2014
Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31220 @ 3.10GHz (6185.9 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
15:44:20 up 43 days, 11:52, 1 user, load average: 0.09, 0.03, 0.01; runlevel 3


———————————————————————–
enchmark Run: Sun May 25 2014 15:44:20 – 16:12:29
CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests


hrystone 2 using register variables 34096183.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
ouble-Precision Whetstone 3622.7 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
xecl Throughput 4651.6 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
ile Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 821145.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
ile Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 234279.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
ile Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1845117.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
ipe Throughput 1888528.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
ipe-based Context Switching 325399.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
rocess Creation 10694.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
hell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5565.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
hell Scripts (8 concurrent) 738.2 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
ystem Call Overhead 2463062.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)


ystem Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
hrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 34096183.8 2921.7
ouble-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3622.7 658.7
xecl Throughput 43.0 4651.6 1081.8
ile Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 821145.0 2073.6
ile Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 234279.4 1415.6
ile Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1845117.2 3181.2
ipe Throughput 12440.0 1888528.5 1518.1
ipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 325399.7 813.5
rocess Creation 126.0 10694.0 848.7
hell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5565.4 1312.6
hell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 738.2 1230.4
ystem Call Overhead 15000.0 2463062.5 1642.0
========
ystem Benchmarks Index Score 1394.4

下面这台是choopa 的一台, E3-1240V3, 16GB RAM, 120G SSD + 2 TB SATA, 自己好好的tune 了一下,感觉性能不会差
这个价格才109 刀,当时的sale 的时候买的。。。

# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
# # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #
# # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ######
# # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # #
# # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # #
#### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #


Version 5.1.3 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark


Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
January 13, 2011 johantheghost at yahoo period com
1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10


1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10


1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3


1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3


1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3


1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3


1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10


1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10


1 x Process Creation 1 2 3


1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10


1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3


1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3


8 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10


8 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10


8 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3


8 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3


8 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3


8 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3


8 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10


8 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10


8 x Process Creation 1 2 3


8 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10


8 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3


8 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3


========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)


System: c.XXXXXX.com: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.32-431.el6.x86_64 — #1 SMP Fri Nov 22 03:15:09 UTC 2013
Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 v3 @ 3.40GHz (6799.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/S
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 v3 @ 3.40GHz (6799.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/S
CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 v3 @ 3.40GHz (6799.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/S
CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 v3 @ 3.40GHz (6799.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/S
CPU 4: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 v3 @ 3.40GHz (6799.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/S
CPU 5: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 v3 @ 3.40GHz (6799.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/S
CPU 6: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 v3 @ 3.40GHz (6799.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/S
CPU 7: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 v3 @ 3.40GHz (6799.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/S
15:25:42 up 42 min, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.02, 0.03; runlevel 3


————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Sun May 25 2014 15:25:42 – 15:54:08
8 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests


Dhrystone 2 using register variables 40468794.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 4298.5 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 4878.0 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1122134.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 297546.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2911603.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1883961.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 252647.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 19914.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 9249.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 4030.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 3162955.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)


System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 40468794.8 3467.8
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4298.5 781.5
Execl Throughput 43.0 4878.0 1134.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1122134.9 2833.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 297546.0 1797.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2911603.1 5020.0
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1883961.5 1514.4
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 252647.6 631.6
Process Creation 126.0 19914.8 1580.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 9249.1 2181.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 4030.9 6718.2
System Call Overhead 15000.0 3162955.5 2108.6
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1981.9


————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Sun May 25 2014 15:54:08 – 16:22:22
8 CPUs in system; running 8 parallel copies of tests


Dhrystone 2 using register variables 176121230.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 29863.9 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 32206.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1091371.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 295250.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 3479340.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 8450886.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 2153105.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 108618.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 37154.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 5026.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 9625051.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)


System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 176121230.8 15091.8
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 29863.9 5429.8
Execl Throughput 43.0 32206.7 7489.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1091371.9 2756.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 295250.1 1784.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 3479340.3 5998.9
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 8450886.4 6793.3
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 2153105.9 5382.8
Process Creation 126.0 108618.6 8620.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 37154.8 8762.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 5026.0 8376.7
System Call Overhead 15000.0 9625051.4 6416.7
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 6106.4


得分是6106.4 的分数,看来还是非常不错的说的, 对于这个配置和这个价格



下面这台是来自于 Gigenet 的一个 sale, E5-1620, 32GB  RAM,  2 X 2TB SATA, Software RAID 1,1G port  用来做我的一台主服务器之一

价格210刀


可能是由于硬盘的原因,整体得分偏低


# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
# # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #
# # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ######
# # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # #
# # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # #
#### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #


Version 5.1.3 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark


Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
January 13, 2011 johantheghost at yahoo period com
1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10


1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10


1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3


1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3


1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3


1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3


1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10


1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10


1 x Process Creation 1 2 3


1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10


1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3


1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3


8 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10


8 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10


8 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3


8 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3


8 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3


8 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3


8 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10


8 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10


8 x Process Creation 1 2 3


8 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10


8 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3


8 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3


========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)


System: e.xxxxxx.com: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.18-371.8.1.el5 — #1 SMP Thu Apr 24 18:19:36 EDT 2014
Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 0 @ 3.60GHz (7200.5 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtu
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 0 @ 3.60GHz (7200.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtu
CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 0 @ 3.60GHz (7200.1 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtu
CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 0 @ 3.60GHz (7199.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtu
CPU 4: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 0 @ 3.60GHz (7200.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtu
CPU 5: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 0 @ 3.60GHz (7200.1 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtu
CPU 6: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 0 @ 3.60GHz (7199.9 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtu
CPU 7: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 0 @ 3.60GHz (7199.9 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtu
14:31:40 up 2:04, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00; runlevel 3


————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Sun May 25 2014 14:31:40 – 15:00:00
8 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests


Dhrystone 2 using register variables 23166156.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 3539.1 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 7430.8 lps (29.8 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 971612.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 263158.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2213730.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1622503.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 252693.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 22676.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 11826.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 4204.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1342008.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)


System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 23166156.3 1985.1
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3539.1 643.5
Execl Throughput 43.0 7430.8 1728.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 971612.9 2453.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 263158.2 1590.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2213730.9 3816.8
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1622503.1 1304.3
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 252693.0 631.7
Process Creation 126.0 22676.1 1799.7
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 11826.4 2789.3
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 4204.0 7006.6
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1342008.4 894.7
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1754.7


————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Sun May 25 2014 15:00:00 – 15:28:26
8 CPUs in system; running 8 parallel copies of tests


Dhrystone 2 using register variables 103613460.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 25013.5 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 40033.7 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 543306.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 138598.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1627178.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 8463569.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 2342040.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 114947.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 52366.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 7434.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 7105686.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)


System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 103613460.2 8878.6
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 25013.5 4547.9
Execl Throughput 43.0 40033.7 9310.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 543306.0 1372.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 138598.7 837.5
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1627178.7 2805.5
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 8463569.1 6803.5
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 2342040.6 5855.1
Process Creation 126.0 114947.1 9122.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 52366.1 12350.5
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 7434.8 12391.3
System Call Overhead 15000.0 7105686.9 4737.1
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 5113.0


最后一台就是我用了两年半的 singlehop的, 非常的好,uptime 100% 可惜价格太贵了,要350刀,还不提供IPMI/KVM

配置: E3-1270 V2, 2 X 500GB Hardware RAID 1, 16GB RAm

# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
# # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #
# # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ######
# # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # #
# # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # #
#### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #


Version 5.1.3 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark


Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
January 13, 2011 johantheghost at yahoo period com
1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10


1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10


1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3


1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3


1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3


1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3


1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10


1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10


1 x Process Creation 1 2 3


1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10


1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3


1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3


8 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10


8 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10


8 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3


8 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3


8 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3


8 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3


8 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10


8 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10


8 x Process Creation 1 2 3


8 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10


8 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3


8 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3


========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)


System: s1.XXXX.com: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.18-371.8.1.el5 — #1 SMP Thu Apr 24 18:19:36 EDT 2014
Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31270 @ 3.40GHz (6784.9 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtua
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31270 @ 3.40GHz (6784.5 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtua
CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31270 @ 3.40GHz (6784.5 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtua
CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31270 @ 3.40GHz (6784.6 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtua
CPU 4: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31270 @ 3.40GHz (6784.5 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtua
CPU 5: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31270 @ 3.40GHz (6784.6 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtua
CPU 6: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31270 @ 3.40GHz (6784.5 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtua
CPU 7: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31270 @ 3.40GHz (6784.4 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtua
14:45:33 up 5 days, 3:29, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00; runlevel 3


————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Sun May 25 2014 14:45:33 – 15:13:53
8 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests


Dhrystone 2 using register variables 21849889.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 1822.7 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 7298.6 lps (29.6 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 888564.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 241785.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2197904.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1530660.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 219342.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 21540.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 11276.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 4053.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1268614.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)


System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 21849889.7 1872.3
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 1822.7 331.4
Execl Throughput 43.0 7298.6 1697.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 888564.7 2243.9
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 241785.0 1460.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2197904.3 3789.5
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1530660.5 1230.4
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 219342.7 548.4
Process Creation 126.0 21540.5 1709.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 11276.0 2659.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 4053.2 6755.3
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1268614.0 845.7
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1572.9


————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Sun May 25 2014 15:13:53 – 15:42:24
8 CPUs in system; running 8 parallel copies of tests


Dhrystone 2 using register variables 97793070.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 12665.3 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 38765.1 lps (29.6 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 630260.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 164123.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1640016.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 8241491.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 2219967.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 111406.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 50224.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 7116.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 6908228.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)


System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 97793070.3 8379.9
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 12665.3 2302.8
Execl Throughput 43.0 38765.1 9015.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 630260.2 1591.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 164123.7 991.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1640016.0 2827.6
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 8241491.9 6625.0
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 2219967.6 5549.9
Process Creation 126.0 111406.1 8841.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 50224.9 11845.5
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 7116.3 11860.5
System Call Overhead 15000.0 6908228.3 4605.5
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 4835.2

说实话,这个分数之低真是超出了我的意外。。估计可能也是硬盘的原因






评分

参与人数 1广告币 +2 收起 理由
BODY + 2 收藏+2分!相信某日我发帖后,河马大大将10.

查看全部评分

相关帖子
学会提问的艺术, 从小处入手, 忌大而空
AdvertCN电报群

我最喜欢用的工具
7200W全球动态不重复住宅IP代理
回复

使用道具 举报

22

主题

561

广告币

693

积分

中级会员

Rank: 3Rank: 3

积分
693

社区QQ达人

发表于 2014-5-26 10:40:38 | 显示全部楼层
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

22

主题

571

广告币

1853

积分

高级会员

Rank: 4

积分
1853

社区QQ达人

发表于 2014-5-26 11:02:40 | 显示全部楼层
liquidweb 以前据称是用PC机当服务器。

点评

就跟hetzner 的低端系列一样。。  详情 回复 发表于 2014-5-26 11:04
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

1618

主题

2万

广告币

2万

积分

管理员

宇宙无敌河马天神

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

积分
29625

社区QQ达人

 楼主| 发表于 2014-5-26 11:04:51 | 显示全部楼层
flyingdog 发表于 2014-5-26 11:02
liquidweb 以前据称是用PC机当服务器。

就跟hetzner 的低端系列一样。。
学会提问的艺术, 从小处入手, 忌大而空
AdvertCN电报群

我最喜欢用的工具
7200W全球动态不重复住宅IP代理
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

162

主题

598

广告币

3038

积分

高级会员

Rank: 4

积分
3038

社区QQ达人

发表于 2014-5-26 15:27:28 | 显示全部楼层
炫技术贴。
免费扫高权重域名限时优惠VIP:加创业干货群52385364
365banzheng.com互联网资质办理
點基跨境
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

92

主题

1158

广告币

2701

积分

高级会员

Rank: 4

积分
2701

社区QQ达人

发表于 2014-5-27 01:58:04 | 显示全部楼层
收藏+2分!相信某日我发帖后,河马大大将100倍奉还!
平价出paxum,平价平价平价!QQ:1293389785,支持小额多次交易,VX:yangkangtashu
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

1

主题

31

广告币

49

积分

初级会员

Rank: 2

积分
49

社区QQ达人

发表于 2014-5-27 23:39:55 | 显示全部楼层
好地方 才知道
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

关于我们|联系我们|DMCA|广告服务|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|Github|网站地图|AdvertCN

GMT+8, 2024-11-24 20:49 , Processed in 0.055328 second(s), 19 queries , Gzip On, MemCache On.

Copyright © 2001-2023, AdvertCN

Proudly Operating in Hong Kong.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表