下午无聊, benchmark 一下手头上几个cloud, vps, dedicated server
下午机器在安装cpanel，需要一段时间，闲的无聊，就测试了手头上几个 cloud， vps 和 dedicated 的性能全部使用的是Unixbench 5.1.13
还有一台德国的server和 加拿大的备份服务器，明天再来测试一下
第一个, liquidweb 的 storm ssd. 这个用了几年了，uptime 100%，确实不错。可惜我确实用不到他们的 managed 的功能，每个月要120 刀，确实很贵。
配置: 2.7 GB Ram, 1 core,35G SSD， 要120 刀 （需要managed 的可以看下wiredtree，liquidweb 感觉全给他们交广告费了，遍地都是liquidweb 的广告）
他们也真敢卖，拿 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31220 的 U 来做cloud
benchmark 的得分确实是最低的。
# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
# # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #
# # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ######
# # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # #
# # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # #
#### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
Version 5.1.3 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark
Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
January 13, 2011 johantheghost at yahoo period com
x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
x Process Creation 1 2 3
x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
=======================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
System: v.XXX.com: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.32-431.11.2.el6.x86_64 — #1 SMP Tue Mar 25 19:59:55 UTC 2014
Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31220 @ 3.10GHz (6185.9 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
15:44:20 up 43 days, 11:52, 1 user, load average: 0.09, 0.03, 0.01; runlevel 3
———————————————————————–
enchmark Run: Sun May 25 2014 15:44:20 – 16:12:29
CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
hrystone 2 using register variables 34096183.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
ouble-Precision Whetstone 3622.7 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
xecl Throughput 4651.6 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
ile Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 821145.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
ile Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 234279.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
ile Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1845117.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
ipe Throughput 1888528.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
ipe-based Context Switching 325399.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
rocess Creation 10694.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
hell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5565.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
hell Scripts (8 concurrent) 738.2 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
ystem Call Overhead 2463062.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
ystem Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
hrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 34096183.8 2921.7
ouble-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3622.7 658.7
xecl Throughput 43.0 4651.6 1081.8
ile Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 821145.0 2073.6
ile Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 234279.4 1415.6
ile Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1845117.2 3181.2
ipe Throughput 12440.0 1888528.5 1518.1
ipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 325399.7 813.5
rocess Creation 126.0 10694.0 848.7
hell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5565.4 1312.6
hell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 738.2 1230.4
ystem Call Overhead 15000.0 2463062.5 1642.0
========
ystem Benchmarks Index Score 1394.4
下面这台是choopa 的一台, E3-1240V3, 16GB RAM, 120G SSD + 2 TB SATA， 自己好好的tune 了一下，感觉性能不会差
这个价格才109 刀，当时的sale 的时候买的。。。
# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
# # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #
# # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ######
# # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # #
# # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # #
#### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
Version 5.1.3 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark
Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
January 13, 2011 johantheghost at yahoo period com
1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Process Creation 1 2 3
1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
8 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
8 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
8 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
8 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
8 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
8 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
8 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
8 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
8 x Process Creation 1 2 3
8 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
8 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
8 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
System: c.XXXXXX.com: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.32-431.el6.x86_64 — #1 SMP Fri Nov 22 03:15:09 UTC 2013
Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 v3 @ 3.40GHz (6799.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/S
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 v3 @ 3.40GHz (6799.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/S
CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 v3 @ 3.40GHz (6799.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/S
CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 v3 @ 3.40GHz (6799.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/S
CPU 4: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 v3 @ 3.40GHz (6799.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/S
CPU 5: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 v3 @ 3.40GHz (6799.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/S
CPU 6: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 v3 @ 3.40GHz (6799.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/S
CPU 7: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 v3 @ 3.40GHz (6799.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/S
15:25:42 up 42 min, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.02, 0.03; runlevel 3
————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Sun May 25 2014 15:25:42 – 15:54:08
8 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 40468794.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 4298.5 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 4878.0 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1122134.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 297546.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2911603.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1883961.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 252647.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 19914.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 9249.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 4030.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 3162955.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 40468794.8 3467.8
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4298.5 781.5
Execl Throughput 43.0 4878.0 1134.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1122134.9 2833.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 297546.0 1797.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2911603.1 5020.0
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1883961.5 1514.4
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 252647.6 631.6
Process Creation 126.0 19914.8 1580.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 9249.1 2181.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 4030.9 6718.2
System Call Overhead 15000.0 3162955.5 2108.6
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1981.9
————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Sun May 25 2014 15:54:08 – 16:22:22
8 CPUs in system; running 8 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 176121230.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 29863.9 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 32206.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1091371.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 295250.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 3479340.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 8450886.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 2153105.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 108618.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 37154.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 5026.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 9625051.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 176121230.8 15091.8
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 29863.9 5429.8
Execl Throughput 43.0 32206.7 7489.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1091371.9 2756.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 295250.1 1784.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 3479340.3 5998.9
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 8450886.4 6793.3
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 2153105.9 5382.8
Process Creation 126.0 108618.6 8620.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 37154.8 8762.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 5026.0 8376.7
System Call Overhead 15000.0 9625051.4 6416.7
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 6106.4
得分是6106.4 的分数，看来还是非常不错的说的, 对于这个配置和这个价格
下面这台是来自于 Gigenet 的一个 sale, E5-1620， 32GBRAM,2 X 2TB SATA, Software RAID 1，1G port用来做我的一台主服务器之一
价格210刀
可能是由于硬盘的原因，整体得分偏低
# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
# # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #
# # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ######
# # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # #
# # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # #
#### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
Version 5.1.3 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark
Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
January 13, 2011 johantheghost at yahoo period com
1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Process Creation 1 2 3
1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
8 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
8 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
8 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
8 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
8 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
8 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
8 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
8 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
8 x Process Creation 1 2 3
8 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
8 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
8 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
System: e.xxxxxx.com: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.18-371.8.1.el5 — #1 SMP Thu Apr 24 18:19:36 EDT 2014
Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 0 @ 3.60GHz (7200.5 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtu
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 0 @ 3.60GHz (7200.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtu
CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 0 @ 3.60GHz (7200.1 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtu
CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 0 @ 3.60GHz (7199.8 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtu
CPU 4: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 0 @ 3.60GHz (7200.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtu
CPU 5: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 0 @ 3.60GHz (7200.1 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtu
CPU 6: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 0 @ 3.60GHz (7199.9 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtu
CPU 7: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 0 @ 3.60GHz (7199.9 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtu
14:31:40 up 2:04, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00; runlevel 3
————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Sun May 25 2014 14:31:40 – 15:00:00
8 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 23166156.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 3539.1 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 7430.8 lps (29.8 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 971612.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 263158.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2213730.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1622503.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 252693.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 22676.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 11826.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 4204.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1342008.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 23166156.3 1985.1
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3539.1 643.5
Execl Throughput 43.0 7430.8 1728.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 971612.9 2453.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 263158.2 1590.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2213730.9 3816.8
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1622503.1 1304.3
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 252693.0 631.7
Process Creation 126.0 22676.1 1799.7
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 11826.4 2789.3
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 4204.0 7006.6
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1342008.4 894.7
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1754.7
————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Sun May 25 2014 15:00:00 – 15:28:26
8 CPUs in system; running 8 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 103613460.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 25013.5 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 40033.7 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 543306.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 138598.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1627178.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 8463569.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 2342040.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 114947.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 52366.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 7434.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 7105686.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 103613460.2 8878.6
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 25013.5 4547.9
Execl Throughput 43.0 40033.7 9310.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 543306.0 1372.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 138598.7 837.5
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1627178.7 2805.5
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 8463569.1 6803.5
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 2342040.6 5855.1
Process Creation 126.0 114947.1 9122.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 52366.1 12350.5
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 7434.8 12391.3
System Call Overhead 15000.0 7105686.9 4737.1
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 5113.0
最后一台就是我用了两年半的 singlehop的, 非常的好，uptime 100% 可惜价格太贵了，要350刀，还不提供IPMI/KVM
配置: E3-1270 V2, 2 X 500GB Hardware RAID 1, 16GB RAm
# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
# # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #
# # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ######
# # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # #
# # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # #
#### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
Version 5.1.3 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark
Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
January 13, 2011 johantheghost at yahoo period com
1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Process Creation 1 2 3
1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
8 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
8 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
8 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
8 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
8 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
8 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
8 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
8 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
8 x Process Creation 1 2 3
8 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
8 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
8 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
System: s1.XXXX.com: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.18-371.8.1.el5 — #1 SMP Thu Apr 24 18:19:36 EDT 2014
Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31270 @ 3.40GHz (6784.9 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtua
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31270 @ 3.40GHz (6784.5 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtua
CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31270 @ 3.40GHz (6784.5 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtua
CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31270 @ 3.40GHz (6784.6 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtua
CPU 4: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31270 @ 3.40GHz (6784.5 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtua
CPU 5: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31270 @ 3.40GHz (6784.6 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtua
CPU 6: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31270 @ 3.40GHz (6784.5 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtua
CPU 7: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31270 @ 3.40GHz (6784.4 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtua
14:45:33 up 5 days, 3:29, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00; runlevel 3
————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Sun May 25 2014 14:45:33 – 15:13:53
8 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 21849889.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 1822.7 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 7298.6 lps (29.6 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 888564.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 241785.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2197904.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1530660.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 219342.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 21540.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 11276.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 4053.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1268614.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 21849889.7 1872.3
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 1822.7 331.4
Execl Throughput 43.0 7298.6 1697.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 888564.7 2243.9
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 241785.0 1460.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2197904.3 3789.5
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1530660.5 1230.4
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 219342.7 548.4
Process Creation 126.0 21540.5 1709.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 11276.0 2659.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 4053.2 6755.3
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1268614.0 845.7
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1572.9
————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Sun May 25 2014 15:13:53 – 15:42:24
8 CPUs in system; running 8 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 97793070.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 12665.3 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 38765.1 lps (29.6 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 630260.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 164123.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1640016.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 8241491.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 2219967.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 111406.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 50224.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 7116.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 6908228.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 97793070.3 8379.9
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 12665.3 2302.8
Execl Throughput 43.0 38765.1 9015.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 630260.2 1591.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 164123.7 991.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1640016.0 2827.6
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 8241491.9 6625.0
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 2219967.6 5549.9
Process Creation 126.0 111406.1 8841.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 50224.9 11845.5
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 7116.3 11860.5
System Call Overhead 15000.0 6908228.3 4605.5
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 4835.2
说实话，这个分数之低真是超出了我的意外。。估计可能也是硬盘的原因
河馬真是服務器達人。。。 liquidweb 以前据称是用PC机当服务器。:lol flyingdog 发表于 2014-5-26 11:02
liquidweb 以前据称是用PC机当服务器。
就跟hetzner 的低端系列一样。。 炫技术贴。;P 收藏+2分！相信某日我发帖后，河马大大将100倍奉还！:lol:lol:lol 好地方 才知道
页:
[1]
